By Professor Rosemary Raygada Watanabe
This document analized two virtual learning enviroment FL3 and Angel. We focus in the comparison of characteristics, potentials and deficits, regarding teaching, learning and working.
The group belonged to the members of the Seminar Teaching and Studying in Virtual Learning Environments launched by Ikarus and the Saarland University of Germany.
The participants in this study were: Ante Demirian, Heiki Laschet, Marianne Hetty, May Phillip Purakattu, Rosemary Raygada Watanabe and Tanja Pullwit.
We analized the pedadogical concepts and the learning theories, Instructional features of FL3 and Angel, possibilities for administration, adaptation and collaboration and the system architecture.
In the tutorial in both platforms, the computer acts as a teacher. All the interaction is between the learner and the computer. Computer based instruction allows students some control over the rate of sequence of their learning (individualization). High speed personalized responses to learner actions yield a high rate of reinforcement. However, there is a lack of interaction. Learners tend to work on their own at a computer, and there are maybe little or if any face-to-face interaction with teachers or other learners.
The strategies we suggest are:
1. Content must balance fundamental skills with higher -order thinking and match curriculums standards.
2. Content must be stimulating and draw students into learning,
3. Content should offer interdisciplinary, multi-sensory paths to learning and help students to find not just one answer to a problem, but range of solutions.
4. Students should not be simple users of content. They should be creators of content and builders of knowledge.
More information
http://sites.google.com/site/rosemaryraygada/ikarushttp://sites.google.com/site/rosemaryraygadaLabels: cases of comparison, distance education, virtual environment